The Mass was this morning at Campion. As was true for George, I was main celebrant and preached. I never imagined back in 1991 when the two of them interviewed me for the consultation psychiatry fellowship at Mass General that I would celebrate their funeral Masses. Of course I was only at the beginning of discerning my vocation to the Society. But, even after entering, it was one of those things I hoped I wouldn't have to do. Given the age difference, however, it is no surprise. Ned was 80. George would be 85 now. I am a mere stripling at 66 (in a few weeks).
_________________________________________________________
Wisdom 3:1-6, 9
Psalm 23
Romans 12:3-9
Mark 4:35-41
There is a degree of comfort in the first reading from the
ancient Book of Wisdom. But only a
degree. "The souls of the just are
in the hands of God and no torment shall touch them."
Hearing these words of assurance gives us a little comfort. But only a little. It is too soon. It will take time to get used to the idea that
Ned has died. It will not be easy to
internalize that Edwin Cassem, of the Society of Jesus, MD is dead. It will take a while to comprehend that he has entered eternal life, that he now
knows something none of us know, or will know, until we too have died.
Death has a different meaning for a Christian. It is no longer simply an inevitable future to
which one must be resigned. It is no
longer a condemnation to nothingness.
Dying in Christ is dying to death itself. Dying in Christ is entering into new life. Once again the reading from Wisdom,
"They seemed in the view of the foolish, to be dead, . . . but they are in
peace." Ned was many things. Foolish was never one of them.
Barbara McManus, Ned's former administrative assistant,
faxed me several pages of his thought. The first page was titled
"CREED." The fourth tenet is: "Death is not depressing. It's
inspiring. It makes one sad but being sad is different from being depressed. If
there is a lot of sadness it is a measure of how much the person was
loved." Were we to turn on a
sadness meter here it would make three or four complete revolutions about the
dial before it settled into place. Ned
was loved. By many. Ned seems to have condensed the reading from
Wisdom in the following tenet: "If you confront death with somebody you
love who is dying, out of that will come learning that transforms your life. It
leaves you stronger, braver, and calmer."
Paul's letter to the Romans, the second reading, detailed
the various gifts with which each of us may be endowed. The reading implies that we may be granted one
or perhaps two of these gifts. But not
all of them. Obviously St. Paul had never
met Ned. Or, he never considered the
possibility that he would exist.
Ned was one of those very rare men who exercised all of the
gifts enumerated by Paul . . . simultaneously.
And he did so with great grace in both the secular sense of: "a
controlled, polite and pleasant way of interacting, and in the theological
sense of: "the gift of God which contains all other gifts, through which
he who accepts God's grace finds comfort."
There are many stories about Ned as a generous giver, a
superb teacher and lecturer, a man who could exhort others to do their
best, (oftentimes by example rather than
word), and as a chairman of psychiatry who was diligent in his duties; sometimes,
it seemed, to the point of obsession.
Basil Cardinal Hume, the late Benedictine
Cardinal-Archbishop of Westminster and son of a physician wrote the following.
"The doctor and the priest have much in common. Both are concerned with people, with their
well-being." Our starting points
are different, but inevitably we discover that our interests
converge." (The) experience of
people tells us, priest and physician, "that many are still bewildered,
indeed haunted, by the perennial problems of pain, suffering and death."
Three tenets of "CREED" flesh out Hume's writing,
as if Ned were writing midrash on it:
The first was, "As clinicians our responsibility is to
always protect the patient. Our obligation is to stand up for the rights of the
patient."
The second, "The secret of care for the patient is
caring for the patient."
And the third, "The core of the doctor's healing role is
loving the patient as the doctor loves himself."
Then there was the prophetic. As Paul wrote, "if prophecy, in
proportion to the faith." It was in
the prophetic sense that Ned responded intellectually, spiritually and
concretely to the perennial problems of pain, suffering and death. Ned's pioneering work in terminal care, the
care of the bereaved and, in particular, with the optimal care committee proved
him a visionary, a cousin, at least, to the ancient prophets of Israel. He saw the need well before anyone else. But unlike most, after seeing the need he did
something about it. And he did so
because of the deep love for others given him through God's gift of grace and
his response to that gift in faith.
I was puzzling over the choice of gospel reading. None of the recommended options caused the
limbic "chung" that said, yes, this is the one. I asked Bill Foley, another Jesuit physician,
if he had any thoughts. He did. The calming of the storm at sea.
CHUNG!!!
Because he did the heavy lifting, because he was always
prepared, because he knew his stuff, Ned calmed many a storm, if not actually
at sea, then in the hearts of his patients trainees, staff and, at times,
entire swatches of Massachusetts General Hospital.
Ignatian meditation includes inserting oneself into a gospel
narrative and exploring it. In that
spirit, place Ned in that boat with Jesus and the anxious whimpering apostles. What would THAT conversation have been like? I will refrain from putting exact words into
Ned's mouth. But, I suspect he would
have indicated that they shut up, bail, and row. And hearing this Jesus would
have grinned, nodded, and said, "Ned, you get it, and you git it. Now, as for the rest of you poor sorry. .
."
After I sent the e-mail announcing Ned's death and funeral
plans to the former Murray fellows and other psychiatrists, replies began to
arrive within an hour. The most common
statement across the e-mails was, "it is the end of an era."
It is the end of an era. But , the end of the era is not the end of a
legacy. The end of an era is not the end of a man's influence. It is, rather, a
challenge to those who lived and worked during that era. It is a challenge to
those who were graced to experience this multi-gifted man. The end of this era is the time to reinforce
the legacy and to build upon it through your own gifts of teaching, caring,
comforting, and in prophetic action.
The prayer on the back of Ned's memorial card was on the
back of his ordination card. It was
composed by Jesuit Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. It summarizes Ned. It summarizes his mission.
"May the Lord
only preserve in me
a burning love for the world
and a great gentleness,
and may he help me
to persevere to the end
in the fullness of humanity."
Ned. God answered
your prayers. And then some.
Requiem aeternam dona
eis, Domine,
et lux perpetua luceat
eis!
"Eternal rest, grant unto him, O Lord
and let perpetual light shine upon him."
_________________________________________________________
I wrote the homily while at Regina Laudis for a few days last week. I may go there whenever I have major writing to do. I will be going back in early September for my annual eight-day retreat.
I took the photos below when I hit a real snag in getting the homily moving.
Most of the outbuildings at the abbey are mostly unpainted except for the doors and window frames. Those are painted red. It has been a while since the trim was repainted. I like the effect of the sun-bleached red, the blistering and peeling of the paint and the variation of color.
A day lily near the barn.
These old wooden wagon wheels were begging to be photographed. I obliged.
+Fr. Jack, SJ, MD
Sorry for you loss father. AMDG
ReplyDeleteThank you. For those who trained or worked under Ned the loss is not complete. He taught us all much that we cannot articulate easily but can appreciate. Thus the loss is attenuated somewhat.
DeleteBlessing on you, Father, for the lovely tribute. Ned's been gone for more than a year and a half and I still expect to see his cheerful face when ever I visit MGH. Alas...
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comment. Ned was a good guy and then some. And smart. One of the smartest men I've known. He and Murray were quite a team. I was blessed to be trained by both of them and to have celebrated and preached at both of their funerals.
ReplyDeleteIn review of the lies . Ned Cassem was part of the clergy sex abuse scandal. His performance during deposition was just that ,a performance. He was trying to save his neck. Ned Cassem was not a good person.
ReplyDelete